UPDATED:     IT IS TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH @ “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS” a/k/a “Anchor Babies”

watch
http://www.examiner.com/article/mexico-weighs-on-texas-birth-certificate-case?CID=examiner_alerts_article

 

THE ABOVE ARTICLE just published CONFIRMS THAT MOTHERS AGAINST ILLEGAL ALIENS is on the right track!    The Mexican constitution which Mexico is now claiming has standing in the United States of America, contradicts every argument which claims that illegal alien, illegal alien infants, also known as anchor babies, are not citizens of the United States.     Please read the above article after you read our article below.
Because the U.S.A. has an illegal immigration problem which consists of “Anchor Babies” a/k/a “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS”, from almost every country, “Mothers Against Illegal Aliens” has focused on the “Mexican Constitution” for the sake of this evaluation, due to the predominately large portion of the Illegal Alien population in the U.S.A. coming from this country.  However, the following analysis can be found to be in line with the other countries which have Illegal aliens flooding in the U.S.A. which are birthing children.

Since a group of illegal aliens residing in Texas filed a lawsuit against the Texas Department of State Health Services, Vital Statistics Unit (Texas) to obtain certified copies of birth certificates for their Texas-born children, commonly referred to as “anchor babies,” the United States of Mexico (Mexico) has weighed in. Last week, Mexico filed a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in support of the plaintiffs. Two days later, DSHS filed a response in opposition. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman granted Mexico’s motion.

Citing Article 30, section A of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, which “establishes that Mexican nationality is acquired by birth or naturalization. Mexican nationality is granted to children born abroad of a Mexican born parent,” Mexico states it is responsible under international and domestic law to protect its nationals wherever they may be residing. So, as illegal aliens from Mexico attempt to obtain certified birth certificates in Texas to establish de facto U.S. citizenship for their Texas-born children, Mexico is claiming, according to its Constitution, the children as Mexican citizens..

Meanwhile, plaintiffs have filed a second amended complaint on behalf of their children, whom they claim, due to being born in Texas hospitals, are citizens of the United States, despite Mexico claiming them as Mexican nationals.

Mexico says it fears Texas is creating a “vulnerable citizenry: undocumented citizens of the United States” by its refusal “to provide birth certificates to U.S. citizen children (the same children Mexico claims as Mexican citizens) when their parents are unable to present U.S. government-issued identification, even when those parents present other highly reliable identity documents.”

THE “MEXICAN CONSTITUTION”

FACT:     1.      

All FEMALE “Mexican Citizens” who are, or become Pregnant while “ILLEGALLY” crossing and/or within the geographical boundaries of the U.S.A., are and remain “Mexican Citizens.”

FACT:     2.

All FEMALE “Mexican Citizens” who are, or become Pregnant while “ILLEGALLY” crossing and/or within the geographical boundaries of the U.S.A., are “ILLEGAL ALIENS”, and they are “ILLEGAL FOREIGNERS.”        (See the “Exclusionary Clause” below –  FACT 2) 

FACT:     3. 

The MEXICAN CONSTITUTIONArticle 30  – states that “Mexican Citizenship” is “ACQUIRED”, by birth or by naturalization, of the “CHILDREN” of a “MEXICAN “CITIZEN” FEMALE” who gives “BIRTH” in a foreign country.

Article 30 of the “Mexican Constitution” is unambiguous and clear.

 “Mexican Citizenship is “acquired”,  at the time of “BIRTH” of the “Anchor Baby” child, of a “Mexican Citizen”  while in the U.S.A

The Constitutionality ofMexican Citizenship is “acquired” for the “Anchor Baby”  under Article 30, Section A., Subsection II.

A “Mexican Citizen” mother in a “FORIEGN COUNTRY“– whether “illegally or legally” in said “Foreign Country” who gives birth to a baby, that baby IS A MEXICAN CITIZEN.

FACT:     4.

In the U.S.A., what is commonly referred to as “Anchor Babies” from Mexico, are unequivocally and  legally, “Mexican Citizens” at the time of their birth in a “foreign country

Article 30.

Mexican nationality is acquired by birth or by naturalization:

  1. Mexicans by birth are:

  2. Those born in the territory of the Republic, regardless of the nationality of their parents:
  3. Those born in a foreign country (i.e. United States of America (USA)of Mexican parents; of a Mexican father and a foreign mother; or of a Mexican mother and an unknown father;

IMG_8432-1

 

The “14th Amendment” & The “Exclusionary Clause

FACT:    1.            Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

FACT:     2.
The “EXCLUSIONARY CLAUSE of the 14th Amendment clearly stated that “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are “FOREIGNERS, ALIENS who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers
IMG_8407-2.png
FACT:     3.
“Anchor Babies” a/k/a “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS are PROHIBITED from “Acquiring” U.S.A. Citizenship or “Obtaining” U.S.A. Passports, because, of the following and as stated above in:
THE “MEXICAN CONSTITUTION

FACT:      4.

Anchor Babies” from Mexico, are unequivocally and legally, “Mexican Citizens” at the time of their birth in a “foreign country

FACT:    5.

The “14th Amendment” & “The Exclusionary Clause” as stated above, by design, clearly defines who can and cannot be a U.S.A. Citizen, set forth :

  1. A “CITIZEN” of a “Foreign” Country cannot “AUTOMATICALLY” “Acquire” U.S.A. Citizenship;
  2. An “ILLEGAL ALIEN” of a “Foreign” Country cannot “AUTOMATICALLY” “Acquire” U.S.A. Citizenship;
  3. An “ILLEGAL FOREIGNER” of a “Foreign” Country cannot “AUTOMATICALLY” “Acquire” U.S.A. Citizenship;

 

FACT:     6.

“Anchor Babies” are at the time of birth while the MEXICAN CITIZEN Mother is “ILLEGALLY”  in a “Foreign Country”:

  1. A “Citizen of Mexico” at the time of birth in a “Foreign Country”;
  2. An “Illegal Alien Infant” at the time of birth in a “Foreign Country” ;
  3. An “Illegal Foreigner Infant” at the time of birth in the “Foreign Country.


FACT:
     7.     “Anchor Babies” ARE – ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS” w/ “Mexican Citizenship

 

FACT:    8:      “Anchor Babies” a/k/a “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS” under these conditions and circumstances DO NOT QUALIFY “and” are NOT ELIGIBLE in ACQUIRING U.S.A. Citizenship.

Anchor Babies” in the U.S.A. are “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS” who have NO U.S.A. CONSTITUTIONAL entitlements to “acquire” U.S.A. Citizenship as stated and outlined in the 14th Amendment & The Exclusionary Clause.  They are not entitled to “Acquire” U.S.A. Citizenship because they Acquire” and holdMEXICAN CITIZENSHIP” at the time of their birth in a “Foreign Country” – as cited in “of the nationality of their parents:

Those born in a foreign country(i.e. United States of America (USA)of Mexican parents; of a Mexican father and a foreign mother; or of a Mexican mother and an unknown father;

WORDS HAVE MEANING! 14th Amendment “Subject” – “To” – or “Of”

When your reading the U.S. Constitution every word including the small words “Of”, “A” and “To” have precise meanings. The U.S. Constitution took 10 years to write and each amendment to the U.S. Constitution at least in the 1800’s was written in the same manner with precise meanings to each and every word. Lawyers were all “Wordsmiths” opposed to todays junk legal professionals in congress that are writing our laws.

Down below I copied the meanings of the two words being used to either give or deny birthright citizenship in the 14th amendment. The word, “Subject TO” was used to deny birthright citizenship. If the word, “Of” had been used instead of the word, “To” then the 14th amendment would have allowed birthright citizenship.

The various meanings of the word, “To” show that the word is mostly refers to a person being “Connected To” the jurisdiction refered to in the 14th amendment. The meanings of the word, “Of” mostly refers to a person being connected to something other than the jurisdiction or away from.

The word, “Subject” is meant to mean your a person that has to obey the laws of the place you are in. Then they added to word, “To” that clarified the meaning of the sentence to mean “Connected”.

You are “Subject To The Jurisdiction” because you have nowhere else to go under foreign law or have an “Allegiance” to the jurisdiction. Before any foreigner is granted legal citizenship they must take the oath of allegiance to the U.S. which makes them “Subject To” or “Connected To”.

(This Word Not Used) You are “Subject Of The Jurisdiction” because you are in it but are connected to something else other than the place you are in. You have no allegiance “To” and are “Not Connected” but you are a “Subject Of The Laws” in the jurisdiction you are in.

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/thread/1026/read-anchor-birthright-citizenship-understanding#ixzz3jyhRi4zQ

The Creation of the 14th Amendment 

http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/thread/1027/

http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/thread/1024/amendment-truth-birthright-citizenship-existed

When your reading the U.S. Constitution every word including the small words “Of”, “A” and “To” have precise meanings. The U.S. Constitution took 10 years to write and each amendment to the U.S. Constitution at least in the 1800’s was written in the same manner with precise meanings to each and every word. Lawyers were all “Wordsmiths” opposed to todays junk legal professionals in congress that are writing our laws.

Down below I copied the meanings of the two words being used to either give or deny birthright citizenship in the 14th amendment. The word, “Subject TO” was used to deny birthright citizenship. If the word, “Of” had been used instead of the word, “To” then the 14th amendment would have allowed birthright citizenship.

The various meanings of the word, “To” show that the word is mostly refers to a person being “Connected To” the jurisdiction refered to in the 14th amendment. The meanings of the word, “Of” mostly refers to a person being connected to something other than the jurisdiction or away from.

The word, “Subject” is meant to mean your a person that has to obey the laws of the place you are in. Then they added to word, “To” that clarified the meaning of the sentence to mean “Connected”.

You are “Subject To The Jurisdiction” because you have nowhere else to go under foreign law or have an “Allegiance” to the jurisdiction. Before any foreigner is granted legal citizenship they must take the oath of allegiance to the U.S. which makes them “Subject To” or “Connected To”.

(This Word Not Used) You are “Subject Of The Jurisdiction” because you are in it but are connected to something else other than the place you are in. You have no allegiance “To” and are “Not Connected” but you are a “Subject Of The Laws” in the jurisdiction you are in.

14th Amendment, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/thread/1026/read-anchor-birthright-citizenship-understanding#ixzz3jygeLSXZ

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/thread/1026/read-anchor-birthright-citizenship-understanding#ixzz3jygTHYY5

DANGER: ANCHOR BABIES have DUAL CITIZENSHIP & VOTE IN BOTH COUNTRIES

For OVER 10 Years, Mothers Against Illegal Aliens has “REPEATEDLY” stated that this is the SINGLE GREATEST NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT WE HAVE when any immigrant who becomes a U.S. Citizen – VOTES IN TWO COUNTRIES.

For OVER 10 Years, Mothers Against Illegal Aliens has also “REPEATEDLY” stated that ILLEGAL ALIEN – “ANCHOR BABIES” who are “ILLEGALLY” handed U.S. Citizenship, receive TWO PASSPORTS and they VOTE IN TWO COUNTRIES!

Mothers Against Illegal Aliens has “REPEATEDLY” established the FACT that in the Constitution of most countries, i.e. Mexican Constitution, “EXPLICITLY” and “CLEARY OUTLINE” that any unborn child in a Mexican Female; is “PREDETERMIND A MEXICAN CITIZEN” prior to birth and at the TIME OF BIRTH!  (See Mexican Constitution Below)

IMG_8432-2.jpg

The U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment states:

‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

The “EXCLUSIONARY CLAUSE” of the 14th Amendment states:

IMG_8407-0.png

This will not, of course, include, PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES, who are:
FOREIGNERS,
ALIENS,
WHO BELONG TO FAMILIES OF AMBASSADORS; or
FOREIGN MINISTERS accredited to the Government of the United States,
But, will INCLUDE EVERY OTHER CLASS OF PERSON”

 

Mothers Against Illegal Aliens as “REPEATEDLY” stated and states, that you “CAN NOT HAVE DIVIDED ALLEGENCES” and those immigrants and ANCHOR BABIES – ABSOLUTELY HAVE DIVIDED ALLEGENCES as we SEE FIRST HAND the dangers and the national security risk that “Dual Citizenship” has on the country when a “So Called “CITIZEN” has “Divided Loyalties.”

Watching JORGE RAMOS a reporter from UNIVISION and his AGGRESSIVE ACTIONS and HIS BEHAVIOR at the Donald Trump News Conference -it  is “evident” that “DUAL CITIZENSHIP” weakens the fabric of our country and gives CITIZENS of another NATION the COURAGE to DICTATE to AMERICANS.

DUAL CITIZENSHIP is NOT LEGAL and IS NOT THE LAW as stated in the Naturalizatoin Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America which was and is  “The language of the current Oath which is found in the Code of Federal Regulations Section 337.1 and is closely based upon the statutory elements in Section 337(a) of the INA.

http://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/naturalization-test/naturalization-oath-allegiance-united-states-America

The above LINK is to the “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services” and YOU CAN READ IT FOR YOURSELF.  Below is the Oath taken of NEW U.S. Citizens:

Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America

Oath

“I hereby declare, on oath,

Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America

Oath

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.”

Note: In certain circumstances there can be a modification or waiver of the Oath of Allegiance. Read Chapter 5 of A Guide to Naturalization for more information.

The principles embodied in the Oath are codified in Section 337(a) in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which provides that all applicants shall take an oath that incorporates the substance of the following:

  1. Support the Constitution;
  2. Renounce and abjure absolutely and entirely all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which the applicant was before a subject or citizen;
  3. Support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
  4. Bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
  5. A. Bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; or
    B. Perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; or
    C. Perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.

The language of the current Oath is found in the Code of Federal Regulations Section 337.1 and is closely based upon the statutory elements in Section 337(a) of the INA.

; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.”

Note: In certain circumstances there can be a modification or waiver of the Oath of Allegiance. Read Chapter 5 of A Guide to Naturalization for more information.

The principles embodied in the Oath are codified in Section 337(a) in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which provides that all applicants shall take an oath that incorporates the substance of the following:

  1. Support the Constitution;
  2. Renounce and abjure absolutely and entirely all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which the applicant was before a subject or citizen;
  3. Support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
  4. Bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
  5. A. Bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; or
    B. Perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; or
    C. Perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.

The language of the current Oath is found in the Code of Federal Regulations Section 337.1 and is closely based upon the statutory elements in Section 337(a) of the INA.

http://www.federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction/


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08/jorge-ramos-ive-never-ceased-to-be-mexican-and-i-vote-in-elections-in-both-countries/

WE HAVE COME A LONG WAY “Anchor Baby”

IMG_8399-300x300

THIS WAS A FOX NEWS INTERVIEW IN 2006 – and MOTHERS AGAINST ILLEGAL ALIENS was the PIONEER of “Grassroots” groups and the “singular” organization that was fighting against “ANCHOR BABIES.”

Donald Trump, along with Radio Talk Show host, Mark Levin and a few others, we have all FINALLY BEEN ABLE TO GET THE TRUTH TOLD!   Illegal Alien Infants a/k/a “Anchor Babies” ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THE USA!   And they are already citizens of their mother’s country PRIOR to birth in the USA!  Substantiating THIS FACT, is the 14th Amendment’s “Exclusionary Clause” which DOUBLES DOWN on the FACTS that “ANCHOR BABIES” are “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS” and should be deported with their families.

MOST IMPORTANT:  Any “Quasi Citizenship” MUST BE RECINDED!  

  

Mothers Against Illegal Aliens

 

http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/05/05/mothers-against-illegal-aliens.html

This is a partial transcript of “The Big Story With John Gibson,” May 4, 2006, that has been edited for clarity.

JOHN GIBSON, HOST: The hundreds of thousands of illegals who walked off their jobs in protest this week are feeling the backlash days later.

The latest FOX News/Opinion Dynamics poll asked Americans how they felt when they saw Monday’s walkout. About two-thirds made them think we need better security at our borders. Only 21 percent thought we should make illegals U.S. citizens.

Joining us now is a person who is part of that majority, Michelle Dallacroce, founder of Mothers Against Illegal Aliens.

MICHELLE DALLACROCE, MOTHERS AGAINST ILLEGAL ALIENS: Thank you for having me

GIBSON: There’s Michelle there. OK. Michelle, in a way, the protest worked in your favor, didn’t it?

DALLACROCE: Well, actually everything is going to work in our favor because the one thing America has got going for it, we have legal citizens that are waking up. These protests are waking up the sleeping giants, if you will, and we have got mothers all across America now so concerned about their children and they have a place to voice it now through Mothers Against Illegal Aliens and it’s wonderful.

GIBSON: What is it that mothers feel illegal aliens — how is it illegal aliens are threatening children per se?

DALLACROCE:  Well, what we have here is, first off, in our schools for instance, we have 185,000 illegal alien children that are in the schools here in Phoenix that we pay for and our tax dollars, our property taxes, as we all know as Americans, is what funds our schools. And what we have is a $21 million lawsuit or fines that were placed by a federal judge here in Phoenix that we are now having to fight through our legislature which is now taking up more tax dollars. Which when you look at the real big picture these children shouldn’t even be in our schools.

These illegal alien children are not under the jurisdiction of this country. When they are born here they are under the jurisdiction of Mexico primarily. That’s why, for instance, we have homework coming home in Spanish and English. Every other word is Spanish. Every other word is English. They are even doing the pledge of allegiance in Spanish. For instance, also Arizona’s state budget…

GIBSON: Michelle, let me ask you, is it your position that even though those children are there in Phoenix they shouldn’t be going to school at all.

DALLACROCE: No. They should be going to school in Mexico. They do have schools in Mexico, don’t they?

GIBSON: I know. But they are in Phoenix. Are you saying you rather they did not attend schools?

DALLACROCE: I say what Mothers Against Illegal Aliens’ position is that they belong in their home country. Their parents do not belong here. They are illegally here and they need to be deported as a family back to their country to go back to their schools in their own homeland rather than coming to our country illegally and then forcing the American people to pay for their education and their free services.

It’s got to stop and Mothers Against Illegal Aliens, as well as all the other grassroots organizations, we’re standing up and we’re saying you are not taking any more of our tax dollars. They are not for you. They are for the families of America and you need to go back to your own country.

GIBSON: All right. Michelle Dallacroce coming to us from Phoenix. Thanks, Michelle, thanks a lot.

DALLACROCE: Thank you so much.

 

 

URGENT VIDEO FOR TRUMP @ Border Security Invention – IT WORKS!

Rock a bye “ANCHOR BABY”

  

MAIA – Defending all legal children in the U.S.A.

   
 

ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES BE ADVISED:  Real Time BORDER SECURITY available NOW!  


Please broadcast this information to all current presidential candidates and your supporters.

Please take the time to consider advertising the attached product that is available NOW to

double the security on our borders. We must keep the message in front of the general public

if we are to gain meaningful action.

AIRCRAFT DETECTION –

PEOPLE DETECTION –

VEHICLE DETECTION –

Because this is seismic, this detection includes underground tunnels.
I attended the live demonstrations of each of the above detection methods. This is financially

efficient technology, and it is environmentally friendly and socially responsible.
For more information, please contact Glenn Spencer directly:

http://bordertechnology.com

p. 520.366.9920

e. info@bordertechnology.com

Does the Mexican Constitution Contradict the Birthright Citizenship of Children born to illegals in U.S.?

IMG_8399.JPG

The ANSWER IS YES!    A BIG FAT “YES!” 

It is a PROVEN FACT that “Anchor Babies” a/k/a “Illegal Alien Infants” are automatic Citizens of MEXICO.

QUESTIONS:

  1.    How can we allow them the same birthright citizenship from the U.S.?

2.    Why is this something that our government has failed to tell us?

3.    Why is the Mexican government staying quite?

In your opinion, are these “Illegal Alien Infants” a/k/a “Anchor Babies” citizens of:

A.   MEXICO;
B.   USA;
C.   MEXICO & USA

YOU CAN ANSWER THESE QUESTION FOR YOURSELF AT THE END.

Long time activist, Michelle Dallacroce, President & Founder of Mothers Against Illegal Aliens researched a little known fact about the Mexican Constitution.

What did you discover about Mexican children born in foreign lands and how does it affect the Dream Act amnesty for anchor babies?  Michelle Dallacroce’s  reply was profound!

The Mexican Constitution, Chapter II, Article 30, paragraph II, states that you are a Mexican by birth if born on foreign territory, sons or daughters of Mexican parents born in national territory. There you have it! Anchor Babies are not U.S. citizens!   “Illegal Alien Infants”  are Citizens of Mexico, according to the Mexican Constitution.  Additionally, THEY ARE ILLEGAL ALIENS INFANTS once they are born in the USA, and they are as “ILLEGAL” as is their mother!

An Illegal Alien Mexican mother, or any foreigner illegally within the USA who is pregnant, can not “birth a Citizen of the USA” – it is against Natural Law and National Law.

It is physically and legally impossible for any woman who is a citizen of another nation and illegally within the geographical boundaries of the USA 50 States, to “CREATE A US CITIZEN.”

Why?  Because an Illegal Alien Female does not have the FULL legal authority to bestow rights of any kind, different than those given to her under her national Constitution, unto her unborn child moments after it’s birth.

The baby is already a citizen of the mothers’ nation once she delivers the child, (abroad anywhere in the world) according to her mothers Constitution.

Therefore, the “Illegal Alien Infant“, is also an illegal alien.

The “Illegal Alien Infant” is no more a citizen of the USA than any child that mother would have walked over the border, hand in hand, who now is considered a “Dreamer” – but as illegal all the same!  There is no difference whether the child was in her stomach or walking next to her when she crossed the border!  The baby is called an “Illegal Alien Infant.”

“April 4, 1997, President Zedillo of Mexico stated that “We will not tolerate foreign forces dictating and enacting laws on Mexicans.”   

Michelle Dallacroce stated that her contention is that she or her organization are not enacting or dictating any laws on the Mexican “Illegal Alien Infants” born by illegal alien females in the US territory.   What Dallacroce has done is shown how the Mexican Government has dictated and enacted their own citizenship laws which clarified that illegal alien babies born abroad are MEXICAN CITIZENS.    

FURTHERING the claimed above by President Zedillo, who stated he would not allow foreign forces to dictate or enact laws on Mexicans while living in the U.S. boundaries illegally,  President Zedilo states that “he was going to use all diplomatic and legal forces at his disposal to….protect Mexicans living in the United States.”

These statements alone prove unequivocally that “ILLEGAL ALIEN INFANTS” can not, are not, and should not be citizens of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  

“A Birth Certificate is not in itself anything but a piece of paper. Just like a Marriage License! Until you go to the church and get the blessing from your Church, then and only then is that “Marriage License” a valid marriage.

The Birth Certificates that these illegal alien mothers have acquired are nothing more than a piece of paper without the full authority of allegiance to the United States of America.

These Illegal Alien Infants” born “geographically over the border” in the USA are unable to swear allegiance to the USA and are unable to be automatically bestowed or granted something that they have never sworn allegiance or that they are legally have a right too!

THE MORE IMPORTANT FACT:

ALL “Illegal Alien Infants’  have had their nationality and citizenship predetermined by it’s MOTHER’s citizenship status, prior to it’s birth, and that is a proven FACT.

Knowing this IMPORTANT FACT, all  “Illegal Alien Infants” are not legally eligible to obtain and aquire US Citizenship or US PASSPORTS, under the terms of the United States Constitution, 14th Amendment because their destiny and predetermined Citizenship was and is in Mexico or any other nation their illegal alien mother came from, which superseded their live birth in the geographical boundaries of the USA.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution clearly states: “All persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States” (emphasis added).

v.

Mexican Constitution “specifically states”:

Article 30.

Mexican nationality is acquired by birth or by naturalization:

A. Mexicans by birth are:

I. Those born in the territory of the Republic, regardless of the nationality of their parents:

II. Those born in a foreign country (i.e. United States of America (USA) of Mexican parents; of a Mexican father and a foreign mother; or of a Mexican mother and an unknown father;

NOW GO BACK UP TO THE TOP AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.